Yesterday marks another dark day for Malaysia. They finally nabbed saudara Anwar soon after he arrived home after having his statement recorded at ACA. The night before, we see She-biri-biri got grilled by Anwar live on TV. How fast things can turn around.
To the 30 plus so called Barisan MPs, where art thou? The rakyat is depending on you to jump to Pakatan Rakyat. This is the only way to strip power from the recalcitrant Umno goons. Their fear of losing power must be at its maximum, when they decided to repeat 1998. Ignoring the fact that majority of Malaysians does not believe Anwar to be a sodomizer, Umno couldn't go any lower.
Najib, gani and musa must've been able to sleep peacefully last night. Their #1 nemesis is now under police custody, and will soon be charged for sodomy. Thats 20 years maximum jail time for Anwar. Raja Petra, nemesis #2 will be summoned to Police HQ today for the "seditious" post he made on MT regarding Rosmah's involvement in Alatantuya murder. And Umno probably has plans to put him away too.
Anyway, Anwar had previously said that he has the alibi and proof of his innocence. Lets hope that is true. Same goes to you RPK and your trusted source. Our doa goes to both of you.
To saiful #$%@$&^%, I'm certain you will be punished if not now, in the afterlife. With 10 million rakyat cursing you to rot in hell, I'll be suprised if you didn't.
Again, to the BN MPs who are having 2nd thought about Umno, jump now and save Malaysia. We can't afford to wait another 5 years.
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Fuel dilemma and wealth creation
Great debate tonight between DS Anwar Ibrahim and Shabery Cheek. Although to me, it looks more like an experienced debater who knows macro economy against a layman, who resorts to firing cheap shots when he couldn't hack it. Well at least Shabery has the guts to face DSAI on live television. If it were Pak Lah, its guaranteed to be one hell of a disaster of Umno. Will be eaten alive and spit out by DSAI like nobody's business.So now we have heard DSAI's approach to reduce petrol price if PR succeed in taking over the government. What I wonder, and was mentioned by Shabery, is how long can the subsidy last? As long as Malaysia is a net exporter, we should be profiting from the oil price increase, but sooner or later, the well will dry up. Maybe not in my lifetime, but during our children's generation. Should that day come, are we going to see a sharp increase in oil prices when government can no longer subsidize our fuel?
The point I'm getting at is, the government in power should focus on wealth creation. Increasing FDI will create wealth. Exporting more than importing will create wealth. Basically, we need surplus of foreign cashflow coming into the country. That is how we can expand the cake for every Malaysians to share. At the moment, the government is only distributing the cake, but no one is putting new cakes into the oven.
But how do we create wealth? The same way how Koreans, Americans, Britain, Japanese, French or any developed nation did it. Invest in R&D and create new products that we can EXPORT. Innovate on the current ones and EXPORT them as well. That is one way how wealth is created. From passenger cars to handphones to LCD tvs, the Koreans have them all. And exporting creates wealth for their country.
Same goes for Singapore. With no natural resources, they focus on other areas for wealth creation: Services sector such as banking, high finance and insurance sector. With clients from all over the world, wealth is certainly pouring into Singapore.
When Malaysia has mastered the art of wealth creation, our Ringgit would surely appreciate, and so will our buying power. That time, maybe we will not be too burdened by the fuel prices since most of us would be able to afford it, even without subsidy. Only then, can we truly be called a developed nation.
Friday, July 11, 2008
On Kevin Rudd's comment about Malaysian democracy
PUTRAJAYA 10 Julai - Perdana Menteri Australia, Kevin Rudd menyifatkan sistem demokrasi dan hak asasi di Malaysia sungguh segar dan hidup.
Beliau berkata demikian ketika ditanya pandangannya oleh seorang wartawan dari Australia mengenai perkembangan hak asasi manusia di negara ini.
"Ia bukan sahaja hidup tetapi tumbuh segar,“ kata Rudd yang dipercayai merujuk kepada soalan yang ada kaitan dengan kenyataan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang mengkritik Rudd sebagai tidak mempedulikan hak asasi di Malaysia.
Rudd dan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi mengadakan sidang akhbar bersama selepas mesyuarat dua hala sempena lawatan kerja Perdana Menteri Australia itu di sini hari ini. - Utusan
Muahahaha tergelak besar saya apabila membaca berita dari Utusan Meloya ni. Bukan sekadar "hidup" tapi "tumbuh segar lagik", bak kata Kevin Rudd.
We visit someone's home for dinner, do we complain that the dishes are too salty, the rice has 'jelantah' etc? Its called manners. Regardless what the truth is, we always say everything is nice and good. Since Kevin Rudd is visiting Malaysia, you wouldn't expect him to critisize our democracy now would you? He was cornered with a leading question, it was expected for him to say "Ia bukan sahaja hidup tetapi tumbuh segar“.
I'm sure majority of urbanites would find this hillarious. Pity the kampung folks who actually believe what Utusan wrote.
Anyway, back to work...
Beliau berkata demikian ketika ditanya pandangannya oleh seorang wartawan dari Australia mengenai perkembangan hak asasi manusia di negara ini.
"Ia bukan sahaja hidup tetapi tumbuh segar,“ kata Rudd yang dipercayai merujuk kepada soalan yang ada kaitan dengan kenyataan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang mengkritik Rudd sebagai tidak mempedulikan hak asasi di Malaysia.
Rudd dan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi mengadakan sidang akhbar bersama selepas mesyuarat dua hala sempena lawatan kerja Perdana Menteri Australia itu di sini hari ini. - Utusan
Muahahaha tergelak besar saya apabila membaca berita dari Utusan Meloya ni. Bukan sekadar "hidup" tapi "tumbuh segar lagik", bak kata Kevin Rudd.
We visit someone's home for dinner, do we complain that the dishes are too salty, the rice has 'jelantah' etc? Its called manners. Regardless what the truth is, we always say everything is nice and good. Since Kevin Rudd is visiting Malaysia, you wouldn't expect him to critisize our democracy now would you? He was cornered with a leading question, it was expected for him to say "Ia bukan sahaja hidup tetapi tumbuh segar“.
I'm sure majority of urbanites would find this hillarious. Pity the kampung folks who actually believe what Utusan wrote.
Anyway, back to work...
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Pak Lah finally announces his retirement
Pak Lah is stepping down come June 2010. Hallelujah? Well, it depends. On the one hand, we're going to have a new Prime Minister who isn't a sleepwalker. On the other hand, this same guy is notoriously given the nickname C4 by bloggers, allegedly involved in a Mongolian murder, and was once critisized when he vowed to bath the keris with Chinese blood.
In my opinion, compared to Abdullah, Najib has got more brutal baggage. And not to mention, his pear-shaped S.O. Just looking at her give me the creeps. Imagining her becoming 2nd lady (1st lady is Her Majesty Tuanku Nur Zahirah) is simply too much.
Abdullah announcing his retreat and make way for a new PM, to me is the right move. He finally gets the strong message post March 8, that the rakyat has lost confidence in his leadership. From a 90% landslide victory back in 2004 and it finally came to this, who would've imagine.
What I wonder is, why wait for another 2 years? Why not now? In this upcoming Umno General Election in December 2008, Pak Lah could easily take the back seat, and let Najib fight amongst the likes of Muhyiddin Yassin, Tengku Razaleigh or Ali Rustam for the President's chair. I mean, 2 years is a long time, anything could happen. Hell, we are only 4 months past the GE, and quite an eventful 4 months it has been. And with Pakatan Rakyat's promise of taking over the Federal government this September, Najib's day of becoming PM in 2010 may not materialize.
Could it be that Pak Lah isn't really keen on making Najib his successor, thus giving a 2-year period just to buy time, and hoping that something would happen within these 2 years that will prevent Najib from becoming PM? Who knows, Pak Lah may have his own choice for the next Prime Minister. Remember Team A, Team B anyone?
On the flip side, with the current catfight going on between Najib an DSAI, maybe now is not the best time for Pak Lah to let go his seat to Najib. Not to mention the scandals upon scandals which keeps turning up these past few weeks. For sure, Najib's popularity among Malaysians, and among Umno members in particular, have deteriorated these days.
So the best move is to delay the transfer of power to June 2010, when most Malaysian have already forgot what happened in 2008. Melayu kan mudah lupa?
Whatever the reason, I hope this day will never happen. Who would want a guy nicknamed C4 for Prime Minister? And may I remind you, this is not C4 the Citroen model. I'll take that C4 anyday...
In my opinion, compared to Abdullah, Najib has got more brutal baggage. And not to mention, his pear-shaped S.O. Just looking at her give me the creeps. Imagining her becoming 2nd lady (1st lady is Her Majesty Tuanku Nur Zahirah) is simply too much.
Abdullah announcing his retreat and make way for a new PM, to me is the right move. He finally gets the strong message post March 8, that the rakyat has lost confidence in his leadership. From a 90% landslide victory back in 2004 and it finally came to this, who would've imagine.
What I wonder is, why wait for another 2 years? Why not now? In this upcoming Umno General Election in December 2008, Pak Lah could easily take the back seat, and let Najib fight amongst the likes of Muhyiddin Yassin, Tengku Razaleigh or Ali Rustam for the President's chair. I mean, 2 years is a long time, anything could happen. Hell, we are only 4 months past the GE, and quite an eventful 4 months it has been. And with Pakatan Rakyat's promise of taking over the Federal government this September, Najib's day of becoming PM in 2010 may not materialize.
Could it be that Pak Lah isn't really keen on making Najib his successor, thus giving a 2-year period just to buy time, and hoping that something would happen within these 2 years that will prevent Najib from becoming PM? Who knows, Pak Lah may have his own choice for the next Prime Minister. Remember Team A, Team B anyone?
On the flip side, with the current catfight going on between Najib an DSAI, maybe now is not the best time for Pak Lah to let go his seat to Najib. Not to mention the scandals upon scandals which keeps turning up these past few weeks. For sure, Najib's popularity among Malaysians, and among Umno members in particular, have deteriorated these days.
So the best move is to delay the transfer of power to June 2010, when most Malaysian have already forgot what happened in 2008. Melayu kan mudah lupa?
Whatever the reason, I hope this day will never happen. Who would want a guy nicknamed C4 for Prime Minister? And may I remind you, this is not C4 the Citroen model. I'll take that C4 anyday...
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Commments by flip flop and si botak
Pak Lah's comment in the Star today.
You think we are doing this for fun? You think we wake up and just decided to bust your chops?
Think again.
We are not disregarding the law as you proclaimed. There is no law. Period. Well, at least for the people walking in the corridors of power, as RPK aptly put it.
Syed Hamid comment in the Star today.
How else do you think the rakyat can voice their concern over the issues affecting their daily lives? We're not special like Saiful, who can simply walk into the office of Najib claiming he got dicked in the ass.
Thats why people took it to the streets, because thats the only way we can convey to the government how angry we are.
Instead of splashing news on the sodomy case all over the MSM, why not focus on issues that are more improtant, i.e ways to curb inflation which is predicted to hit between 6-7 percent after the petrol and diesel price hike, or how social problems with our teenagers are getting more out of hand, or at least tell us where did the RM 330 billion tax paid to the government by Petronas since the 80's went.
On the protection offered by the Home Ministry to Balasubramaniam from whoever he's running away from, HELLLLLOOOOOO baldy! I think Bala is hiding from you guys, not the other way around. So stop creating bullshit stories saying someone from PR side is trying to get to him.
When will amenor learn that Malaysians are not as stupid as they think? Please stop trying to bring us down with this bullshit.
You think we are doing this for fun? You think we wake up and just decided to bust your chops?
Think again.
We are not disregarding the law as you proclaimed. There is no law. Period. Well, at least for the people walking in the corridors of power, as RPK aptly put it.
Syed Hamid comment in the Star today.
How else do you think the rakyat can voice their concern over the issues affecting their daily lives? We're not special like Saiful, who can simply walk into the office of Najib claiming he got dicked in the ass.
Thats why people took it to the streets, because thats the only way we can convey to the government how angry we are.
Instead of splashing news on the sodomy case all over the MSM, why not focus on issues that are more improtant, i.e ways to curb inflation which is predicted to hit between 6-7 percent after the petrol and diesel price hike, or how social problems with our teenagers are getting more out of hand, or at least tell us where did the RM 330 billion tax paid to the government by Petronas since the 80's went.
On the protection offered by the Home Ministry to Balasubramaniam from whoever he's running away from, HELLLLLOOOOOO baldy! I think Bala is hiding from you guys, not the other way around. So stop creating bullshit stories saying someone from PR side is trying to get to him.
When will amenor learn that Malaysians are not as stupid as they think? Please stop trying to bring us down with this bullshit.
Cerita lepak kedai mamak
Semalam saya dan isteri pergi minum petang di kedai mamak. Bila mamak ambik order sampai, isteri saya terus order nasik putih dan daging merah. "Berat jugak tu", kata saya. "Tengahari tadi I tak sempat makan, so lapar sangat" balas isteri.
Memandangkan jam masa tu pun dah dekat pukul 7 malam, ingatkan minum petang merangkap makan malam sekalilah. So saya tanya isteri saya "Malam nanti you masak ke?". Dia jawab "malam nanti I masak".
Bila tiba giliran saya untuk order, saya pun order bihun goreng, ringan-ringan ajelah, sebab isteri saya akan masak untuk makan malam. Mamak pun tulis la dalam kertas bihun goreng yang saya order, lepas tu terus beredar.
Saya panggilla mamak tu balik "Mamak air tak order lagi la". "La, tadi kan sudah order air masak", balas mamak dengan loghat Indianya. Hmm, pelik juga perangai mamak ni, bila masa pulak kami order air masak. Malas nak panjangkan cerita, saya pun kata "OK lah, air masak kasi 2", lalu mamak itu beredar ke dalam kedai.
Dalam masa 10 minit, order pun sampai. Sambil makan saya dan isteri berbual2 tentang hal anak-anak, hal politik, perang di Iraq, afganistan, berita saham, mengumpat pasal pekerja jusco yang dok kat meja sebelah dan hal-hal lain. Tiba-tiba, isteri saya berkata "I tau kenapa mamak tu ingat kita order I masak". Saya bertanya "Ha apasal?". Jawab isteri "Masa you tanya tadi malam ni I masak tak, I jawab I masak. Mamak tu ingatkan kita nak order air masak kot..." Tergelak besar saya, patutla mamak tu confident je kata kami dah order air. Salah faham rupanya.
"Boleh masuk cerita lawak antarabangsa ni", ujar saya sambil isteri tersenyum..
Memandangkan jam masa tu pun dah dekat pukul 7 malam, ingatkan minum petang merangkap makan malam sekalilah. So saya tanya isteri saya "Malam nanti you masak ke?". Dia jawab "malam nanti I masak".
Bila tiba giliran saya untuk order, saya pun order bihun goreng, ringan-ringan ajelah, sebab isteri saya akan masak untuk makan malam. Mamak pun tulis la dalam kertas bihun goreng yang saya order, lepas tu terus beredar.
Saya panggilla mamak tu balik "Mamak air tak order lagi la". "La, tadi kan sudah order air masak", balas mamak dengan loghat Indianya. Hmm, pelik juga perangai mamak ni, bila masa pulak kami order air masak. Malas nak panjangkan cerita, saya pun kata "OK lah, air masak kasi 2", lalu mamak itu beredar ke dalam kedai.
Dalam masa 10 minit, order pun sampai. Sambil makan saya dan isteri berbual2 tentang hal anak-anak, hal politik, perang di Iraq, afganistan, berita saham, mengumpat pasal pekerja jusco yang dok kat meja sebelah dan hal-hal lain. Tiba-tiba, isteri saya berkata "I tau kenapa mamak tu ingat kita order I masak". Saya bertanya "Ha apasal?". Jawab isteri "Masa you tanya tadi malam ni I masak tak, I jawab I masak. Mamak tu ingatkan kita nak order air masak kot..." Tergelak besar saya, patutla mamak tu confident je kata kami dah order air. Salah faham rupanya.
"Boleh masuk cerita lawak antarabangsa ni", ujar saya sambil isteri tersenyum..
Monday, July 7, 2008
Imelda's birthday party
On Saturday night, we had a birthday party for Imelda. She turned 4th last month, so it was 1 month belated. For the past 3 years, we never missed having a birthday bash for her since she was the only one. This year though, we celebrated her 4th on a small scale, invited only our parents and siblings. We're reserving the bigger birthday party for Ashman, when he turns 1 this September.
Nevertheless, last Saturday turned out to be a blast. The main menu was barbeque steaks and lasagna. All home-made. And garden salad to complement the proteins, fats and carbohydrates. I became the grill-man, making sure the chicken, beef and kambing are bbq-ed to perfection. The first batches of beef and kambing turned out overcooked on one side, and totally carbon-black on the other. Upon discussion of bbq re-strategy with my assistant Syed (sister in law's hubby) we improved our bbq skills and taking better care of the flame. Soon after, all the chicken, beef and kambing looked like they came from San Fransisco Steakhouse (just kidding). OK, they were all edible, and taste good too.
Everyone praised the lasagna, which my wife made. She really put in the effort to prepare them, using the finest ingredients: minced-beef, mozarella cheese, fresh milk, oregano, rosemary and bay leafs. Plenty of left-over that everyone got to tapau for breakfast.
We had the baskin robbins icecream cake that everyone enjoyed and 100% cleared within 10 minutes after blowing the candles. Delicious Big Apple donuts and pastries, compliments from my sisters (thank you Ina and Suzy) and mother-in-law's home-made curry puffs made sure everybody was stuffed.For dessert, we had fresh fruits aplenty, and finally teh tarik for after-eating gossip and political discussion. With whats currently going on in Malaysia, literally there's not enough teh tarik to go around, and so we had to serve coffee afterwards.
But hey, something is missing...oh yeah, where is Imelda the birthday girl? She was upstairs in her room, playing with the cousins and opening presents. Ah never mind, as long as she's having a good time.
By the time the last guest left, it was almost 11.30. The clock showed 1 am by the time I went to bed. A long day, but very worthwhile. Even Imelda who went to bed that night starving had fun. I noticed she did'n eat anything except some icecream cake. We all look forward to breakfast and lunch tomorrow, where the menu is bbq chicken and kambing. Also, the next birthday party for Ashman.
Friday, July 4, 2008
How much is an SD worth?
Definition - A statutory declaration is a signed statement made by virtue of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835 before an officer authorised to administer an oath, such as a justice of the peace, Commissioner for Oaths or a solicitor with a practising certificate. It has the same effect as a sworn document (an Affidavit).
I pulled that from a UK Govt website since I wasn't sure what it means. Anyway, ignoring the Declarations Act 1835 since it probably applied in the UK only, the rest of the definition should hold true in Malaysia.
Within these 1-2 weeks, we've been presented with quite remarkable and suprising SD's. Beginning with Raja Petra's SD on Rosmah's presence at the Altantuya C4 fiasco, Balasubramaniam's original SD, and now, Balasubramaniam's amended SD.
If I were given RM1 for every SD that I'm reading, man thats RM3 already!. Not bad for
someone who have little idea what and SD means, just 3 weeks ago.
Anyway, yesterday Mr Balasubramaniam put forward his SD via DSAI, which clearly stated Datuk Seri Najib's involvement with Altantuya. And today, he retracted his original SD, and replaced it with a new SD. Only this time, the Najib's involvement with Altantuya (sexually and officially) is removed. And a newly appointed lawyer to boot, replacing Americk Singh Sidhu.
What is this saying about the Statutory Declaration?
It just brings the value of an SD to zero. I mean, you can make as many SD's as you like, but it doesn't have to be the truth. Lying in your SD. Malaysia will be flooded with Statutory Declarations, but God knows which ones are true and which ones aren't.
Imagine this: DSAI making an SD about his innocence in the Sodomy case, while Saiful Bukhari's SD claiming DSAI's prick was in his ass. Which one will we believe now? I forsee this event taking place not too long from now.
The IGP is saying one thing, DSAI is saying another.
Balasubramniam is saying A, while Najib is saying B.
AG is not talking, Pak Lah flip-flop is still dozing.
Razak Baginda is still a mystery, so are Sirul and Azilah Hadri.
Somethings gotta give.
Thursday, July 3, 2008
Kenyataan Akhbar and Kenyataan Bersumpah tentang Hubungan Najib dan Altantunya
Untuk manfaat semua, saya telah menterjemahkan teks Saudara Anwar ke Bahasa Malaysia.
Diharap dapat menyebarkan lagi kejutan terkini kepada seluruh rakyat Malaysia mengenai kes Altantuya dan Najib Tun Razak.
Dari pejabat Anwar Ibrahim: Kenyataan Akhbar untuk pendedahan serta-merta
3 Julai 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
Hari ini kita menyaksikan satu lagi episod dan pattern yang konsisten dalam penyalahgunaan kuasa dan manipulasi sistem jenayah kehakiman.
Baru baru ini, seorang saksi dalam kes Altantuya telah menemui kami dengan maklumat terperinci tentang perkara yang telah berlaku yang membawa kepada kehilangan, dan seterusnya pembunuhan Altantuya. Maklumat yang diterima adalah amat mengejutkan.
En. P. Balasubramaniam, yang dilantik oleh Abdul Razak Baginda sebagai penyiasat persendirian beliau, telah dinasihati oleh peguamnya untuk merekodkan kenyataannya secara bebas. Hari ini, dia telah melafazkan deklarasi bersumpah (statutory declaration) bertarikh 1 Julai 2008 kepada umum, yang menerangkan dengan terperinci perkara sebenar yang berlaku dan apa yang telah diberitahu kepada beliau oleh watak watak utama dalam saga ini, seperti Abdul Razak Baginda dan Altantuya sendiri. Kenyataan kenyataan di bawah mendedahkan perkara perkara berikut:
1. En Balasubramaniam telah dilantik oleh Abdul Razak Baginda untuk mneyelesaikan masalah dia diganggu oleh Altantuya mengenai tuntutan hutang Razak kepada beliau.
2. Altantuya telah dijanjikan komisen sebnyak USD500,000 kerana telah membantu dalam menguruskan hal pembelian kapal selam di Paris.
3. Altantuya telah diperkenalkan kepada Razak Baginda oleh Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak semasa berlangsungnya satu pameran berlian di Singapura.
4. Altantuya, Datuk Seri Najib dan Razak Baginda pernah dilihat makan malam bersama di Paris.
5. Selepas kehilangan Altantuya, satu kekecohan telah berlaku di hadapan rumah Razak Baginda, beberapa hari selepas 20 December 2006, di mana kawan-kawan Altantuya dan seorang yang dikenali sebagai Mr Ang (penyiasat peribadi Altantuya) datang untuk mencari dimanakah Altantuya berada. Balasubramaniam yang berada di situ terpaksa menelefon polis. Sebuah kereta peronda polis tiba sejurus kemudian. Sejurus selepas itu, seorang pegawai penyiasat dari Balai Dang Wangi yang menguruskan kes orang hilang, tiba setelah mendapat laporan dari kawan kawan Altantuya mengenai kehilangan Altantuya. Balasubramaniam kemudiannya menelefon Razak Baginda, yang semasa itu berada di dalam rumah, untuk melaporkan apa yang sedang berlaku di depan rumah beliau. Razak kemudiannya menelefon DSP Musa Safri untuk memberitahu perkembangan tersebut. Tidak lama kemudian, Musa telah menghubungi pegawai Dang Wangi yang sedang berada di depan rumah Razak. Mereka berbual selama 3-4 minit, dan Inspektor itu mengarahkan rakan rakan Altantuya untuk meninggalkan kawasan tersebut dan berjumpa dengan beliau pada keesokan hari. Dipercayai bahawa DSP Musa Safri adalah penjaga peribadi (bodyguard) kepada Datuk Seri Najib pada waktu itu.
6. Balasubramaniam telah ditahan dan disoal siasat selama 7 hari dia Bukit Aman. Ini berlaku pada hujung bulan November 2006. Dia telah melaporkan segala apa yang diketahuinya kepada pihak polis mengenai Razak Baginda, Altantuya serta hubungan mereka dengan Najib. Maklumat ini walaubagaimanapun telah dikecualikan daripada laporan polis yang beliau tandatangani.
7. Semasa perbicaraan kes Sirul, Azilah dan Razak Baginda di Mahkamah Shah Alam, pegawai pendakwaraya tidak sekalipun menyentuh tentang hubungan di antara Altantuya dan Datuk Seri Najib, ataupun tentang panggilan telefon dari Musa Safri kepada Razak Baginda.
8. Sejurus sebelum Razak Baginda ditangkap, beliau telah memberitahu pada Balasubramaniam yang dia telah menerima satu SMS dari Najib berbunyi "Saya akan bertemu dengan IGP pukul 11 pagi ini...segalanya akan diselesaikan...bertenang".
Kenyataan Balasubramaniam juga ada menyebut tentang perhubungan rapat antara Altantuya dan Najib Tun Razak (mereka mempunyai hubungan seks, dan Najib ada melakukan liwat pada Altantuya).
Walaubagaimanapun, dakwaan dakwaan oleh Balasubramaniam ini menimbukan beberapa soalan untuk pengetahun umum:
a. Penyorokan bukti oleh pegawai polis penyiasat dan pegawai pendakwaraya. Penyorokan bukti seperti ini cuma boleh berlaku dengan pengetahun penuh dari peringkat tertinggi, seperti IGP dan AG.
b. Persoalan juga ditimbulkan dengan penyorokan bahan bukti ini, apabila berlaku pertukaran pegawai pendakwaraya pada saat terakhir, di mana ketua Cawangan Jenayah AG Chambers, Datuk Yusuf Zainal Abiden telah diketepikan dari mengendalikan kes tersebut, dan pegawai Senior DPP Sallehudin Saidin juga di suruh bersara awal beberapa bulan kemudian.
c. Persoalan juga timbul tentang pertukaran hakim pada saat perbicaraan sedang berjalan pada Mac 2007 - mengapa ia dilakukan?
d. Adakah Datuk Seri Najib berbohong apabila dia menyatakan tidak pernah bertemu dengan Altantuya?
e. Adakah Datuk Seri Najib berbohong dalam menyatakan dia tidak terlibat dalam isu komisen dalam pembelian kapal selam Scorpene?
Kenyataan En. Balasubramaniam menunjukkan apa yang telah kami nyatakan selama ini, bahawa siasatan dan perbicaraan kes Altantuya ini tidak dijalankan dengan telus, dan perbicaraan telah diadakan sedemikian rupa dengan keputusan mahkamah telah di tentukan lebih awal. Ini memberi kesan yang serius kepada badan kehakiman, di mana integriti dan kredibiliti badan badan utama seperti kehakiman, polis and AG Chambers telah tercalar.
Pendedahan pada hari ini membuktikan satu pattern yang konsisten dengan penyalahgunaan sistem kehakiman yang telah disaksikan oleh negara ini semenjak 1998. Dakwaan dakwaan ini memerlukan satu Suruhanjaya Siasatan DiRaja ditubuhkan segera bagi menyiasat dengan lebih lanjut.
-Anwar Ibrahim-
End of translation
Diharap dapat menyebarkan lagi kejutan terkini kepada seluruh rakyat Malaysia mengenai kes Altantuya dan Najib Tun Razak.
Dari pejabat Anwar Ibrahim: Kenyataan Akhbar untuk pendedahan serta-merta
3 Julai 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
Hari ini kita menyaksikan satu lagi episod dan pattern yang konsisten dalam penyalahgunaan kuasa dan manipulasi sistem jenayah kehakiman.
Baru baru ini, seorang saksi dalam kes Altantuya telah menemui kami dengan maklumat terperinci tentang perkara yang telah berlaku yang membawa kepada kehilangan, dan seterusnya pembunuhan Altantuya. Maklumat yang diterima adalah amat mengejutkan.
En. P. Balasubramaniam, yang dilantik oleh Abdul Razak Baginda sebagai penyiasat persendirian beliau, telah dinasihati oleh peguamnya untuk merekodkan kenyataannya secara bebas. Hari ini, dia telah melafazkan deklarasi bersumpah (statutory declaration) bertarikh 1 Julai 2008 kepada umum, yang menerangkan dengan terperinci perkara sebenar yang berlaku dan apa yang telah diberitahu kepada beliau oleh watak watak utama dalam saga ini, seperti Abdul Razak Baginda dan Altantuya sendiri. Kenyataan kenyataan di bawah mendedahkan perkara perkara berikut:
1. En Balasubramaniam telah dilantik oleh Abdul Razak Baginda untuk mneyelesaikan masalah dia diganggu oleh Altantuya mengenai tuntutan hutang Razak kepada beliau.
2. Altantuya telah dijanjikan komisen sebnyak USD500,000 kerana telah membantu dalam menguruskan hal pembelian kapal selam di Paris.
3. Altantuya telah diperkenalkan kepada Razak Baginda oleh Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak semasa berlangsungnya satu pameran berlian di Singapura.
4. Altantuya, Datuk Seri Najib dan Razak Baginda pernah dilihat makan malam bersama di Paris.
5. Selepas kehilangan Altantuya, satu kekecohan telah berlaku di hadapan rumah Razak Baginda, beberapa hari selepas 20 December 2006, di mana kawan-kawan Altantuya dan seorang yang dikenali sebagai Mr Ang (penyiasat peribadi Altantuya) datang untuk mencari dimanakah Altantuya berada. Balasubramaniam yang berada di situ terpaksa menelefon polis. Sebuah kereta peronda polis tiba sejurus kemudian. Sejurus selepas itu, seorang pegawai penyiasat dari Balai Dang Wangi yang menguruskan kes orang hilang, tiba setelah mendapat laporan dari kawan kawan Altantuya mengenai kehilangan Altantuya. Balasubramaniam kemudiannya menelefon Razak Baginda, yang semasa itu berada di dalam rumah, untuk melaporkan apa yang sedang berlaku di depan rumah beliau. Razak kemudiannya menelefon DSP Musa Safri untuk memberitahu perkembangan tersebut. Tidak lama kemudian, Musa telah menghubungi pegawai Dang Wangi yang sedang berada di depan rumah Razak. Mereka berbual selama 3-4 minit, dan Inspektor itu mengarahkan rakan rakan Altantuya untuk meninggalkan kawasan tersebut dan berjumpa dengan beliau pada keesokan hari. Dipercayai bahawa DSP Musa Safri adalah penjaga peribadi (bodyguard) kepada Datuk Seri Najib pada waktu itu.
6. Balasubramaniam telah ditahan dan disoal siasat selama 7 hari dia Bukit Aman. Ini berlaku pada hujung bulan November 2006. Dia telah melaporkan segala apa yang diketahuinya kepada pihak polis mengenai Razak Baginda, Altantuya serta hubungan mereka dengan Najib. Maklumat ini walaubagaimanapun telah dikecualikan daripada laporan polis yang beliau tandatangani.
7. Semasa perbicaraan kes Sirul, Azilah dan Razak Baginda di Mahkamah Shah Alam, pegawai pendakwaraya tidak sekalipun menyentuh tentang hubungan di antara Altantuya dan Datuk Seri Najib, ataupun tentang panggilan telefon dari Musa Safri kepada Razak Baginda.
8. Sejurus sebelum Razak Baginda ditangkap, beliau telah memberitahu pada Balasubramaniam yang dia telah menerima satu SMS dari Najib berbunyi "Saya akan bertemu dengan IGP pukul 11 pagi ini...segalanya akan diselesaikan...bertenang".
Kenyataan Balasubramaniam juga ada menyebut tentang perhubungan rapat antara Altantuya dan Najib Tun Razak (mereka mempunyai hubungan seks, dan Najib ada melakukan liwat pada Altantuya).
Walaubagaimanapun, dakwaan dakwaan oleh Balasubramaniam ini menimbukan beberapa soalan untuk pengetahun umum:
a. Penyorokan bukti oleh pegawai polis penyiasat dan pegawai pendakwaraya. Penyorokan bukti seperti ini cuma boleh berlaku dengan pengetahun penuh dari peringkat tertinggi, seperti IGP dan AG.
b. Persoalan juga ditimbulkan dengan penyorokan bahan bukti ini, apabila berlaku pertukaran pegawai pendakwaraya pada saat terakhir, di mana ketua Cawangan Jenayah AG Chambers, Datuk Yusuf Zainal Abiden telah diketepikan dari mengendalikan kes tersebut, dan pegawai Senior DPP Sallehudin Saidin juga di suruh bersara awal beberapa bulan kemudian.
c. Persoalan juga timbul tentang pertukaran hakim pada saat perbicaraan sedang berjalan pada Mac 2007 - mengapa ia dilakukan?
d. Adakah Datuk Seri Najib berbohong apabila dia menyatakan tidak pernah bertemu dengan Altantuya?
e. Adakah Datuk Seri Najib berbohong dalam menyatakan dia tidak terlibat dalam isu komisen dalam pembelian kapal selam Scorpene?
Kenyataan En. Balasubramaniam menunjukkan apa yang telah kami nyatakan selama ini, bahawa siasatan dan perbicaraan kes Altantuya ini tidak dijalankan dengan telus, dan perbicaraan telah diadakan sedemikian rupa dengan keputusan mahkamah telah di tentukan lebih awal. Ini memberi kesan yang serius kepada badan kehakiman, di mana integriti dan kredibiliti badan badan utama seperti kehakiman, polis and AG Chambers telah tercalar.
Pendedahan pada hari ini membuktikan satu pattern yang konsisten dengan penyalahgunaan sistem kehakiman yang telah disaksikan oleh negara ini semenjak 1998. Dakwaan dakwaan ini memerlukan satu Suruhanjaya Siasatan DiRaja ditubuhkan segera bagi menyiasat dengan lebih lanjut.
-Anwar Ibrahim-
End of translation
Statutory Declaration by Mr. P. Balasubramaniam
Holy crap! This is a bombshell material definitely. If we can call this the Atomic bomb on Hiroshima, RPK's supposedly 'informed' evidence should be called the Atomic bomb on Nagasaki. Only now, the bombs are on the present government.
I am reposting this here since its now quite difficult to access DSAI's blog, where the article is originally posted. Also, Malaysia-Today has just been hacked yesterday. Not sure when it's going to be back online. Up till this afternoon, still offline.
Oh, and by the way, check this out..
"25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse. "
Seems like Najib's got experience doing the anal, maybe he did Saiful Bukhari, not DSAI :)
I am reposting this here since its now quite difficult to access DSAI's blog, where the article is originally posted. Also, Malaysia-Today has just been hacked yesterday. Not sure when it's going to be back online. Up till this afternoon, still offline.
Oh, and by the way, check this out..
"25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse. "
Seems like Najib's got experience doing the anal, maybe he did Saiful Bukhari, not DSAI :)
Press Statement and Statutory Declaration on Relationship between Najib and Altantuya
From the Office of Anwar Ibrahim: Press Statement - for immediate release
3 July 2008,
Today we witness another episode of a consistent pattern of abuse of power and manipulation of the criminal justice system.
Recently one of the witnesses in the Altantuya trial approached us with detailed information of events connected to her disappearance and murder. The information was shocking.
Mr. P. Balasubramaniam, who was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda as a private investigator was advised to seek legal counsel and document his story independently.
Today he is releasing a statutory declaration dated 1st July 2008 to the public detailing the story that he has to tell about what actually happened and what was told to him by key personalities in this saga including Abdul Razak Baginda and Altantuya herself.
These revelations speak for themselves. They reveal, amongst others, the following allegations:
1.Mr. Balasubramaniam was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda to deal with alleged harassment by Altantuya in relation to debts owed to her (Paragraph 5 and 6).
2.Altantuya was promised a commission of USD 500,000 for assisting in a submarine deal in
3.Altantuya was introduced to Razak Baginda by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in
4.Altantuya, Datuk Seri Najib and Razak Baginda had all been seen together at a dinner in
5.After the disappearance of Altantuya, a commotion took place in front of Razak Baginda’s house several days after 20 December 2006 where girl friends of Altantuya and one Mr.Ang (Altantuya’s own private investigator) arrived searching for Altantuya. Balasubramaniam had to call the police. A patrol car arrived shortly. Shortly thereafter an investigating officer from Dang Wangi Police Station who was handling the missing persons report lodged by one of Altantuya’s girl friends arrived. Balasubramaniam then informed Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. Razak then called one DSP Musa Safri who called him back informing him that Musa would be calling him on his handphone and that he was to pass the phone to the inspector from Dang Wangi Police station. Balasubramaniam then received the call from Musa Safri and duly passed the phone to the inspector. After the conversation of 3 - 4 minutes, the inspector told the girls to disperse and to see him the next day (Paragraphs 34 - 38). We believe DSP Musa Safri was aide-de-camp to Datuk Seri Najib at the material time.
6.Balasubramaniam was interrogated at Bukit Aman for seven consecutive days and his statement recorded at the end of November 2006. He says that he told the police all that he knew including everything Razak Baginda and Altantuya had told him about their relationships with Najib. These details were omitted from the statement he was asked to sign (Paragraph 49).
7.During the trial of Sirul, Azilah and Razak Baginda at at the Shah Alam High Court, the prosecutor did not ask him any questions in respect of the relationship Altantuya had with Datuk Seri Najib or of the phone call that he had received form DSP Musa Safri (Paragraph 50).
8.When Razak Baginda was arrested, Balasubramaniam was told by him that he had sent an SMS messsage to Najib the evening before (Paragraph 51). Razak also informed Balasubramaniam that he had received an SMS from Najib and showed it to him; the message read “I am seeing IGP at 11 A.M. today …. matter will be solved … be cool”.
Mr. Balasubramaniam’s evidence also mentions the extent of the relationship between Altantuya and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. We are not interested in the personal nature of the relationship. That is entirely his own business and hers.
However the allegations revealed by him raise key questions of public interest:
a)Suppression of evidence by the police investigating officers and those responsible for prosecuting this case. Such suppression could only have happened with the full knowledge of top public officials such as the IGP and the AG.
b)The question is also raised as to whether such suppression of evidence was the reason behind the last minute switch in DPP’s handling the case - where the head of the Criminal Division of the AG’s Chambers, Datuk Yusuf Zainal Abiden was completely sidelined from the case leading him and the senior DPP originally slotted for the case Sallehudin Saidin to put in papers for early retirement some months later.
c)Questions can be raised now with regard to the sudden switching of the judge fixed to hear the case which took place in March 2007 - why was this really done?
d) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he had never met Altantuya before?
e) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he was not involved in any commission deals for the purchases of the Scorpene submarines”
Mr.Balasubramaniam’s evidence vindicate what we have been saying all along; there has been no proper investigation of the murder of Altantuya and the investigation and proceedings in court seem to following a pre-arranged script for a pre-arranged outcome.
This has serious implications for the administration of justice in the country where the integrity and credibility of our key institutions such as the police, the AG’s chambers and the judiciary are already severely tarnished.
Today’s revelations further confirm a clear and consistent pattern of manipulation of the criminal justice system that we have witnessed in this country since 1998.
The allegations revealed here warrant a full Royal Commission of Inquiry.
ANWAR IBRAHIM
— Statutory Declaration by Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal —
STATUTORY DECLARATION
I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal (NRIC NO: xxxxxx-xx-6235) a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at xxxxx, Selangor do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-
1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.
2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.
3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.
4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.
5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.
6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.
7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.
8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.
9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.
10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in
11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.
12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.
13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.
14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.
15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.
16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.
17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to
18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.
19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.
20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in
21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.
22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to
23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.
24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.
25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-
25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in
25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.
25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.
25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in
25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in
26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in
27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.
28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-
28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in
28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in
28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in
28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in
28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.
28.6That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in
28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.
30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The drivers window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.
31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.
32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.
33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.
34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.
35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.
36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.
37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.
38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 - 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.
39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.
40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to
41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.
42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.
43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.
44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for
45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.
46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.
47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.
48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.
49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.
50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.
51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.
52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- ” I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.
53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.
54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-
54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.
54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.
54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.
55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.
SUBCRIBED and solemnly )
declared by the abovenamed )
Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ]
this day of 2008 )
Before me,
………………………………….
Commissioner for Oath
03
Jul
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
Not again...
The following police report was made on 28 June 2008 @ 5.45 PM by Mohd Saiful Bukhari bin Azlan,
"Saya Mohd Saiful Bukhari b Azlan ingin melaporkan bahawa saya telah diliwat oleh majikan saya. Perkara ini berlaku tanpa kerelaan saya. Kejadian terakhir berlaku 26/6/08 di Unit 1151, Kondominium Desa Damansara, Jln Setia Kasih, KL. Oleh itu, tujuan laporan ini dibuat untuk mendapat pembelaan dan keadilan keatas diri saya. Saya juga berasa bimbang dengan keselamatan diri dan keluarga saya jika perkara ini tersebar luas di khalayak ramai. Majikan saya Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim - Ketua Umum PKR." (sumber rockybru.blogspot.com)
With DSAI busy running all over the country and abroad (he was in Madinah 2 days prior), strategizing his move for PR to takeover the Federal Govt in a few months, and yet still have time to screw Saiful in the asshole. What bull crap is this??
Anwar is just average build, and 60+ years old. Saiful is 23 and approx 5'10". To say that he was overpowered by DSAI seems too far fetched, unless DSAI had an accomplice. But there was no mention of a 3rd person in the police report. Again, what bull crap is this?
Looks like amenor is running out of ideas to stop DSAI. They can't pin him on corruption because there aren't any, they can't charge him of using C4 against anybody, so they use sodomy instead. Simple, yet punishable by 20 years imprisonment if found guilty. Thats more than enough time to clean up Malaysia's coffers, and probably the same time when our oil wells would dry up.
If you're an Islam, please perform the Solat Hajat and may Allah protect DSAI while exposing the real perpetrators. For others religion, please pray in his or her own beliefs. We are so close to 16 September, lets hope it becomes a new dawn for all Malaysians.
"Saya Mohd Saiful Bukhari b Azlan ingin melaporkan bahawa saya telah diliwat oleh majikan saya. Perkara ini berlaku tanpa kerelaan saya. Kejadian terakhir berlaku 26/6/08 di Unit 1151, Kondominium Desa Damansara, Jln Setia Kasih, KL. Oleh itu, tujuan laporan ini dibuat untuk mendapat pembelaan dan keadilan keatas diri saya. Saya juga berasa bimbang dengan keselamatan diri dan keluarga saya jika perkara ini tersebar luas di khalayak ramai. Majikan saya Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim - Ketua Umum PKR." (sumber rockybru.blogspot.com)
With DSAI busy running all over the country and abroad (he was in Madinah 2 days prior), strategizing his move for PR to takeover the Federal Govt in a few months, and yet still have time to screw Saiful in the asshole. What bull crap is this??
Anwar is just average build, and 60+ years old. Saiful is 23 and approx 5'10". To say that he was overpowered by DSAI seems too far fetched, unless DSAI had an accomplice. But there was no mention of a 3rd person in the police report. Again, what bull crap is this?
Looks like amenor is running out of ideas to stop DSAI. They can't pin him on corruption because there aren't any, they can't charge him of using C4 against anybody, so they use sodomy instead. Simple, yet punishable by 20 years imprisonment if found guilty. Thats more than enough time to clean up Malaysia's coffers, and probably the same time when our oil wells would dry up.
If you're an Islam, please perform the Solat Hajat and may Allah protect DSAI while exposing the real perpetrators. For others religion, please pray in his or her own beliefs. We are so close to 16 September, lets hope it becomes a new dawn for all Malaysians.
And to Raja Petra, we're still waiting for your write-up on this. Can't wait on what you have to say. And not to forget, the evidence against Mrs C4 as well. Bring it on!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
